SteynOnline

Mohamed Elmasry, host of Canada's all-time record-breaking fundraiser, looks like he's even more Socks short of a drawer. If you're keeping score:

For his original case study on Maclean's and my "flagrant Islamophobia", there were five Sock Puppets.

By the time the suit was filed in Ontario, the Sock Puppet Five were a quartet: Ali Ahmed had gone missing.

Then Daniel Simard bailed and the Sock Puppet Four were reduced to the Sock Puppet Three - just Khurrum Awan and his fetching Sockettes.

Now, judging from this letter to The Toronto Star, Khurrum is down to his last Sockette. Muneeza Sheikh is strangely absent from the act, and it's now down to Khurrum Awan plus full supporting chorus of one: Socky and Cher.

The Muslim Sockernacle Choir is a very strange act: The same old song, but sung by fewer and fewer voices. Indeed, given that Mr Awan has spent the last year and a half saying the same thing over and over and over on stage, radio, TV and in print, you'd think he'd be a bit better at his shtick by now (see Blazing Cat Fur's review of his live performance).

As Scaramouche notes, today's plaintive whine is a reprise of their usual clubfooted sleight of hand. Mr Awan and Naseem Mithoowani complain:

Among other things, the articles imply that Islam condones sex with minors and animals, refer to Muslims as "sheep-shaggers" and allege that Muslims believe in drinking the blood of their enemies.

Well, if they've got a problem with the "implication" that Islam condones sex with minors they should work to get the Iranian, Saudi, Pakistani and many other Islamic marriage laws amended. "Sheep-shaggers"? Complain to the Ayatollah Khomeini's publishers. Blood drinking? Go argue the finer points with the prominent British Muslim Omar Brooks, who made the claim at Trinity College, Dublin. If Khurrum and Naseem seriously objected to any of the above, they'd take it up with their coreligionists. But what they really object to is non-Muslims even raising the subject.

We've been around this a zillion times, and my last word on ovine fornication and other critical issues can be found in Lights Out. But this little bit does seem to be new:

Ezra Levant accuses Canada's human rights commissions of censorship for investigating our hate-speech complaints about his publishing of cartoons depicting Muslims...

"Our" hate-speech complaints? Is that true? Did Khurrum Awan and Naseem Mithoowani file "human rights" complaints about The Western Standard? I wasn't aware of that. As readers may recall, I'm a little bit sweet on Naseem, and I'm sorry to see her stuck in her role as Tony Sockando's last remaining back-up singer. The key to the sock market is knowing when to get out. 

Now that all his many cases against Maclean's magazine for running Steyn's "flagrant Islamophobia" have been dismissed, it's safe for the strangely retiring serial plaintiff Mohamed Elmasry to appear in public again. Elmo is launching a new magazine called The Canadian Charger, which I'd assumed was for Canadians who wish to charge the cost of their crappy grievance-mongering lobby groups to the taxpayer. But apparently Elmo is reduced to having to raise private capital for his literary venture. Blazing Cat Fur went along to watch the outpouring of support:

Elmo began his fundraising effort in earnest. He asked the crowd, which numbered possibly 200 at most; Who would be the 1st to pledge Ten Thousand Dollars? An awkward and prolonged silence was met by a revised supplication. Who would be the 1st to pledge Five Thousand Dollars? Barely a murmur was heard. Plaintively Elmo asked; Who would be the 1st to pledge One Thousand Dollars? At this point I hung my head in a sense of almost empathetic embarrassment.

Apparently, one hand did go up at the back. But it was just a minor Saudi sheik beating his fourth wife.

You'd think Elmo would be savvy enough to do as he did in his Maclean's suits and bring in some sock puppets to paper the room and run up the bids. As it happens, the evening was emceed by Head Sock Khurrum Awan but without the lovely Sockettes. He gave his usual winning performance:

Nervously, Khurrum Awan introduced himself as the evenings MC. Stumbling but brief in his remarks, he outlined the events schedule - it was his only official appearance. A lawyer this ill at ease speaking in public should be a concern to any potential client.

Oh, dear. Maybe Elmo needs to rethink his approach. Would you put your money where Khurrum Awan's mouth is? The star turn, by the way, was Talibanic totty Yvonne Ridley, never my idea of a non-stop laff riot, even before she converted to Islam.

Turning our attention to an even more spectacular fundraising debacle by Canadian "human rights" champions, the Black Rod's report on the titanic fiasco that is the Canadian Mausoleum - whoops, Museum - of Human Rights includes this cryptic aside on its new "Content Advisory Committee":

In January, the CMHR announced a new Content Advisory Committee of human rights scholars, specialists, leaders and acknowledged experts in their respective fields.

The group consists of the old advisory committee, minus two, plus six new names.

One of the two outcasts was Anthony Hall, the 9/11 Truther who was using his seat on the committee to bolster his credibility with his conspiracy-minded friends...

The other name missing from the new advisory committe is Ruth Selwyn, "former executive director, Canadian Human Rights Foundation". In March, 2008, she wrote to the editor of the Montreal Gazette attacking Mark Steyn, who you recall, fought a knock 'em down, drag 'em out battle with a human rights commission---and won.

Wrote Selwyn:

"It is a pity that space is given to Mark Steyn's self-serving campaign to ridicule human rights. Steyn's representation of marginal cases as the be all and end all of the work of human-rights commissions shows a lack of understanding of the system or, worse, a deliberate attempt to distort it.

Oh that we could move on and focus on the real issues such as the discrimination that people do face every day in Canada."

But now it seems it's Ms Selwyn who's moved on. Perhaps she could be an advisor to The Canadian Charger.

I had a grand time sitting in for Wendy Sullivan and Mike Williams on the first anniversary edition of their Brass Balls radio show, and was rather chuffed (as they say in Britain) by the reaction. I don't play records on the radio very often these days, and a lot of folks seemed to enjoy it, several suggesting that I bring along some of the murkier contents of my music library the next time I guest-host for Rush.

Aside from our round-up of reaction here, Kathy Shaidle lists a few, er, highlights:

You giggled nervously at his tale of being tongue-kissed by Leonard Bernstein.

You cringed when he played that awfull Sinatra recording. 

Oh, I don't know. It wasn't that awful - Frank's record, I mean, not Lenny's tongue. However, the downside, as Kathy points out, is that Wendy and Mike are now contemplating a rather severe clobbering on their next bandwidth bill. They put together a terrific show every week, so, if you're minded to chip twelve dollars - a buck a month - for a year's worth of great listening, please do so. Don't forget, you can stick it on your credit card and, under Good King Barack's new Obamatopian regime, never have to pay it back! How great a deal is that?

A year and a half after its last intervention on the issue, The Nanaimo Daily News returns to the subject of Canada's "human rights" commissions and effortlessly maintains its dazzling standards of factual accuracy:

Lacking the clout or legal expertise of Levant, Mark Steyn was ordered to pay a fine, write a letter of apology and never to discuss gay marriage publicly or privately for the rest of his life.

Can't wait for that to show up in online biographies. Nanaimo readers with long memories may have difficulty squaring Darrell Bellaart's report with the paper's previous observations.