|
Saturday, 11 October 2008 |
|
"Ernst Gauss" (not his real name, as he has explained at length) writes:
Some months ago, I predicted to you that the Steyn exemption would soon find its way into Canadian jurisprudence in all 3 of your Hate Crime cases. I was right then, I will be right when the Levant exemption takes place, and it's time you acknowledged what is staring you right in the face.
These laws were created by Jews to be used against the enemies of Jews. You and McLean's are just as guilty as Doug Collins and the North Shore News (or just as innocent), and the only difference is the target of your "hate".
Here's the decision on the Collins case. You can read all 4 of this great journalist's articles at the end of the decision.
I look forward to your next Hate Speech article, supporting Terry Tremaine, who is still facing jail for the crime of annoying Jews.
Ernst Gauss
Herr Gauss' argument is that, under Canada's "human rights" regime, Jewish lobby groups get to chastise Judeophobes and win every time, but Muslim lobby groups that attempt to stick it to Islamophobes get given the bum's rush. This hardly seems a recipe for a multicultural utopia. Neither I nor Ezra Levant is a fan of what Ezra calls "the official Jews" at the Canadian Jewish Congress et al, but, if you wanted to devise a system designed to confirm to the paranoid that the International Jewish Conspiracy is running everything for its own advantage, the Canadian "human rights" racket could hardly be bettered.
|
