|
 |
|
When barristers in short pants attack... |
|
|
|
Tuesday, 01 January 2008 |
|
I see the anonymous masterminds behind Law Is Cool have now sunk their baby teeth into Jay Currie. You'd think the poor touchy little things would have realized they were way out of their depth by this point, but instead their ripostes are getting even more fantastically pompous:
The complainants in the case are not synonymous with this website, in part or in its entirety.
You would be wise to be informed of this distinction before making any such statements.
Love it. All the portentous self-importance of your big-time QC with none of the legal skills. What's Law Is Cool threatening with their you-would-be-wise-or-else routine? Gonna call in m'learned friends and sue Mr Currie, are we? To be fair to the nellies, this latest threat lacks the bracing directness of their previous one:
Steyn's freedom is hardly at stake.
Yet.
Bring it on, boys.
|
|
|
|
|
|