|
Is that even possible? The sensitive anonymous blogger at LawIsCool writes:
We must have missed that front-page episode, as well as the other dozens of articles countering the extreme views expressed by Steyn and others (don’t forget the others) in Maclean’s.
But then again, it is quite possible we missed it, seeing how we canceled our subscriptions to the magazine.
Oh, really? What's that - the royal "we"? How many "subscriptions" did you fellows have from Maclean's until you belatedly discovered my book excerpt?
Incidentally, for all the portentous legalistic posturing, M'Learned Anonymity appears to have breached Canadian copyright law and engaged in intellectual property theft by reprinting in full the Nanaimo Daily News editorial. But what do I know? I'm not a lawyer.
C'mon, Mr Anonypussy, why so shy? I've heard of witnesses who have to have their identities protected, but not a lawyer. When you graduate and you appear in court, are you going to revive those English barrister's wigs but wear them over the front of your face?
|