On Wednesday, after a lively three hours on radio and the latest episode of our Orwellian audio adaptation, Mark joined Tucker Carlson to discuss Nancy Pelosi's "most diverse impeachment team in American history".
Click below to watch:
You can see the full hour of "Tucker Carlson Tonight" here.
For those who prefer Mark in non-visual formats, he'll be back this evening with Episode Five of our latest Tale for Our Time - George Orwell's ever timelier Nineteen Eighty-Four. And just ahead of that Laura's Links will round up the Internet for you.
Tales for Our Time is made with the support of members of The Mark Steyn Club. You can find more details about our Club here - and we also have a gift membership.
Comment on this item (members only)
Submission of reader comments is restricted to Mark Steyn Club members only. If you are not yet a member, please click here to join. If you are already a member, please log in here:
Member Login
90 Member Comments
Dear Mark Steyn: Well, we can certainly find comfort in the knowledge that conservatives will emerge from this trouble much stronger, unified under the leadership of those true conservatives at the Lincoln Project. Honest, transparent family men like John Weaver will inspire us just as he did when he led the wildly successful Kasich campaign ("outlasted Jeb" really lit the bonfires).
As I've said before, I really wanted Kasich to succeed, and thought his path to steal away Trump voters was easy and obvious in 2015. Instead, Kasich took an obviously losing course, and I was left to wonder. Time has shown Kasich to be a fool, and Weaver to be lying to everybody, mostly to himself. As we watch the R circular firing squad fire at Trump for splitting the grand old party, I'm reminded how right you've been all along- Trump succeeded in 2016 by talking to republican voters who were left behind by the people who ran the party. Never forget that the old guard of the party destroyed it, not Trump and not his supporters.
"Never forget that the old guard of the party destroyed it, not Trump and not his supporters."
And don't forget to include Conservative Inc (.... FNC; National Review; "conservative" think tanks etc).
Someone online made an incredible point: Banning social media sites for people plotting doing things is absurd and idiotic because for starters no serious group would be stupid enough to post their plans on social media and any stupid enough to do so would be incredibly easy to stop or arrest and throw in jail everyone involved because the names and evidence are visible to all.
At least Fang Fang has shown us just how nauseating a prostitute's job can be.
Yes: debasing, horrible. What a twerp!
I mean how low can one go?! A Swallwell assignment must've been like low man on the scrotum pole.
You are hilarious Fran! All I keep thinking is, "Not for all the tea in China!".
That's genius at work, F.
(Hee hee) I lost my compassion with traitors, Michael. It's the worst. They rationalize screwing the country over while they screw the enemy and then they have the gonads to show their face again in public and then vote to Impeach our President?! (C'mon man, who's the bad man, Swallwell?) People just as awful and smarter are getting away with betrayal and murder and never get their due punishment. I guess it's with a renewed retribution in our words and actions (boycotts are fine by me now) that we have to attack the powerful phonies in DC, news networks and Silicon Valley oligarchs who want to shut us up. We're the enemy to these elites, without question. I think good people are finally getting off the couch now and getting angry. We have a huge hill to climb here. It seems like everyone in positions of power now are aligning against us.
We have to get the Fangs out in the open:)
How about: time to let it all Fang out!
Fangs for that, F.: your good cheer always sustains me. It numbers high among the blessings for which I am eternally Fangful. (Crunch! I really can overdo a joke, can't I?)
I must've read too many children mag jokes to the kids because all the overdone jokes are planted in my hippocampus. Fang Fang gets a lot for the Bang.
;-D!!!!
Are Dorsey et al "cleansing" the world to protect their billions, because they are worried the Dems will go after their wealth, unless they become indispensable to the left wing?
I cancelled Twitter before The Dorsey Twit cancelled me! I feel a great load off my back.
Interesting thing Fran, I didn't have to cancel my Twitter account, or Spotify, or Facebook or whatever because I'm not on any of those platforms. I used to be on Facebook, but bailed on that as soon as Mark Zuckerberg declared that there were more than two genders, back in 2011 I think it was. My how far we've come.
The thing is that I'm like most people. Most people don't participate in social media. My participation is limited to LinkedIn, which I use exclusively as a networking device for job searches.
What gives social media power is not social media itself, because most people don't use it. Social media derives its power from the fact that the mainstream media lends it outsized credibility by quoting it. Think about that.
Thinking...
This might take a while...
Actually, nice exchange, all.
Really, Mr. Dee Twit probably cancelled me because I hardly used it. I liked to catch what Laura was tweeting about and Bob Belvedere, too. I refused to post my photograph because my Lovebird photographed more brilliantly. Oh, that Peachy, she died on Christmas Day. It tore me up when she raised her left wing a few times as if to say, "thank you for your good care, but no more tweets from me."
I read columnists to help clarify more precisely the things I've either been taught or have come to know through my 68 years. Thomas Sowell, the late Walter Williams, Mark Steyn and the inimitable Ann Coulter. I particularly like Ann's commentary and viewpoint as being pretty spot on. She has been brutal in her blistering descriptions of Donald Trump recently. I have no doubt these comments may be on the money even if they are disturbing to me and my support of Trump. I would ask Mark the favor of submitting the question to Ann as to what manner of person would she name and support for 2024? I've met a few state and national level politicians and without exception, they would never, ever have weathered the onslaught Trump has endured. I would say his healthy dose of narcissism was one of the personality traits that enabled him to weather the storm. As far as letting me down, I don't need a BBQ buddy or a drinking buddy. My view is he did as much as he possibly could under the absolute war against him (and us Trumpsters) over the last four years. I would like to hear Ann's short list for 2024.
I've been puzzled by her sudden turnabout which occurred during the past year or so. I think she supported him initially but I don't read her stuff or watch her on TV. Trump's outsized personality and ego can be difficult to deal with so maybe he insulted her somehow. It wouldn't surprise me, but what does surprise me are people, including Coulter, who will air their personal disagreements in the public square. I wouldn't undermine a vulnerable president who has already endured relentless vicious attacks, slander, and hate from both parties and then add to it. I would say nothing and then maybe write a book about my grievances against him after he was out of office.
Ann seems to follow the stock market rule. She bought Trump when he was low, and she dumped him at his peak, shortly after the election. Her method seems to sell lots of books.
Great points Aly. You have identified a key weakness among Republicans and a great strength of the Democrats (who never break ranks.)
I believe Ann sees Trump hasn't followed through on tougher immigration enforcement making many other issues irrelevant as demographics determine our future.
She should have saved her vitriolic rage for those who deserve it, namely the Democrats, who will now push for open borders.
"I would say his healthy dose of narcissism was one of the personality traits that enabled him to weather the storm."
Precisely! Mark often mentioned Trump's huge ego - approvingly - in terms of his ability to play "smash-mouth" with the Establishment and the Left: "On offense, not defense". At the same time, he noted there needed to be more Trumpism and less Trump; more Candidate Trump and less President Trump - particularly on immigration.
PS. Notice that Never Trumpers don't care about the sustained four year coup against the President? These are people who talk about "character", and turn a blind eye to crime and corruption and constitutional violations and censorship - as long the target is Trump. And notice how much they much they sound just like the Left?
Wasn't Anne the one who adored Romney for such a long while? Enough said.
Regarding President Trump's term in office, I was looking at some saved online articles and emails from the past four years and thought, "My God, I can't believe what they did to him - and to us". I feel we should catalog the sins of the Dems/Left and enumerate all they did to destroy Trump (and his supporters) and derail his agenda from the moment he was elected in 2016. Their strategic sabotage began before his Inauguration and it will continue until his last day in office, whenever that will be.
I don't know how we could do that, with members adding to it or correcting events and incidents as need be. Or if Mark would allow us to compile it within the comment section. I think it would be helpful to document and remember just how insane they were the entire four years and that no other president could have withstood such a relentless barrage of hate, trickery, accusations, lies, deceit, intimidation, treachery, (often from within his own party, staff, and cabinet). We must never forget the hurt and pain they caused him and his family, the public humiliation and cruelty they endured, and I never heard Trump whine or complain about it, unlike the thin-skinned, arrogant, pompous Obama, of whom no criticism was EVER allowed.
Whatever his shortcomings, and as a president he had several, he withstood the daily onslaught because he is a fighter by nature, and using that analogy, he went to the mat for the American people time and again to try and preserve the values, virtues, and principles that make America special and great.
I hope this doesn't sound like a melodramatic harangue, but I feel we should have some kind of group discussion and sharing on this topic. For closure, if nothing else. I don't want them to take that away from us, too.
Ms. Smyth: To your post script- the Never boys who worked for Bush had front row seats to the eight-year coup from 2001-08, yet they were happy to see it employed by dems against Trump. All this hate, just because they couldn't milk the Jeb campaign for another $100 m.???
It's not melodramatic at all.
In a speech just before the 2016 election, he said he could've enjoyed a comfortable life instead of subjecting himself and his family to the daily horror show (which had barely started at that point), but was driven to help his fellow Americans make the nation great again.
PS. He needs to pardon Assange (and probably Snowden) ASAP.
Wasn't sure where the "penetration" line was going ... a missed opportunity there! But, "The name is Fang, Fang Fang", certainly hit the, err, spot.
Does anyone notice how much Jack Dorsey resembles Ted Kaczynski, both in appearance and in his fanatical devotion to cleansing the world of all the things of which he does not approve? The latter point is well illustrated by the latest video from Project Veritas. Maybe we should start referring to @Jack as the Unabanner.
Unabanner - very good!
Very sharp observation! What is certain beyond question is that Dorsey is every bit as mad as Kaczynski. The difference is that 'Mad Jack' is in a position to hurt many more people and he's hardly alone in the new People's Republic of America. Half the country is OK with this tyranny and that's the truly scary part.
I would say less than half. The election was so badly compromised who knows what the actual vote numbers for Biden were? Also, I know many people who don't like Trump but also don't like what Big Tech/Dorsey is doing.
It seems greater than it is because of the MSM's complicity along with the major corporations aligning with the Left. But I believe they backed "the strong horse", as Bin Laden said, who they perceive holds the power. If the GOP were united in their support for Trump from the start I don't think that would have happened.
The Left speaks and acts louder than their numbers. In contrast, the Right has been permanently designated as the "silent majority". But perhaps that will change since the Dems seem determined to test our limits.
A dedicated school prefect with a cane, then, R. A toady with the power to do more than tattle. How I loathe such people. I'm glad at least to labour under the misapprehension that they don't come into my life.
Bin Laden - "n-l-a" = Biden. Creepy!
Thank God for Mark Steyn! He has the guts to say on national TV the things that even Tucker is intimidated to say aloud. Well said, Mark!
Yes! Every night he's so right on that I think he consistently tops himself even!
The lesson there for all is you can only say what you want if you retain your financial independence.
The thing about Eric Swalwell is that he's not just emblematic of the compromised nature of so many of our politicians, he's emblematic of the brazenness of it all. He knows that he's compromised. He knows that you know that he's compromised. He just doesn't care. Why doesn't he care? Because the likes of Super Scout Jim Comey know that he's compromised, yet rather than do anything about it Comey sits there and talks to the compromised Swalwell about other people being hypothetically compromised. And they wonder why people hate them.
After Fox's betrayal of their middle-class audience, that was benefitting mostly from Trump's policies and his intrepid willingness to face the vicious unending attacks directed against him, I can only watch Carlson's show. But even that is not always easy--except when Mark is on.
Tucker like most of the MSM never made a serious attempt to investigate election fraud despite the egregious harm it would do to the entire country and its future if it's true. He said he had "mixed feelings" about the fraud allegations that restrained his usually dogged curiosity to discover and expose the truth. Wouldn't making an attempt at least to determine if there was valid evidence of the greatest scandal in American history or not settle down his "feelings."
Did Fox Brass intervene and order him and his "top notch" staff not to investigate election fraud? The other irritation for me is Tucker's occasional need to let his audience know for the umpteenth time that he never fully supported Trump even now when he's on the impeachment ropes once again. Tucker seems to be turned off by what he perceived to be Trump's vulgar manner and inferior intellect. He hasn't expressed it in those exact words but his occasional scornful jabs at Trump's character are similar to the way he excoriates most of the liberals he mocks on his show. At least that is my perception.
I wouldn't discount that Tucker modulates his rhetoric to please the Fox brass. He may be the top rated show in cable news, but so was O'Reilly. Anyone can be replaced and I'm sure that Tucker values his income. Not that I blame him, I value my income and sometimes have to modulate my tone because of that. The difference is that I'm not in the business of dispensing political opinion or investigative journalism. It's one thing to sit in a corporate meeting and not challenge the boss's political pronouncements, which have nothing to do with your job. It's another thing to be a well-known TV personality, whose alleged claim to fame is as a champion of the people, which Tucker often says he is, then to shy away from your greatest chance to be that champion.
Well said Matthew. I agree.
Like you, I wasn't personally attacking Tucker who is a brilliant and experienced political host at times. It's more a review of his show by one of his wavering, insignificant viewers. As a main on-air cog on FNC, he and his network decided before the election to reverse their original obligation to provide an alternative to lefty MSM politics and instead they all joined the Democrat/Ryan bandwagon to a victory over Trump and his supporters.
Some were very pleased with the outcome. Their refusal to investigate the fraud certainly didn't reduce the anger in the minds of most Fox viewers.
By ignoring real concerns about election integrity - concerns which were publicly expressed by VP Pence on January 4th - Tucker Carlson hugely damaged his credibility. To admit "mixed feelings" only highlights that there was an onus to look into the issue, instead of adopting the MSM party line.
Last week, a commenter said that "all of us" (Mark included) needed to ask how we may have contributed to the events of January 6th. Maybe TC should do the same. Because it was clear starting on November 4th that the mainstream media - and especially the Murdoch press - were creating the conditions for unrest by dismissing well-founded claims rather than exploring them.
The alarm over FOX being "cancelled" by the empowered Left must make TC wonder whether it was wise to betray his audience on the issue that mattered most.
You've got a knack for telling the painful truth, Kate, and you did it again. I was very annoyed by that, too. A little glossing over the fact that there were undeniable and extensive miscarriages of the election laws is pretty close to unforgivable. At the very least, why can't we get someone somewhere to examine what happened in those five to seven states that couldn't pull off a count by the end of Election Day. Then to be cancelled for saying Stop the Stea
People being cancelled - by school boards and record labels - for attending a political rally!
How long before "unity" is achieved by the harassment and abuse of known conservatives when they're out in public?
I feel like this can't be really happening and yet I get a flagged bit of news or a flash headline and it's somebody new getting erased. I don't know about you but recently my jaw is getting very tense as if it's going to break from all the horrible things I see happening. Teacher unions are fighting not to go back to school. I'm catching up to the readings in TFOT. Mind blowing similarities with today. "Artsem" stunned me. Today it's old news. Face recognition! On my cell phone They already know everything about us. They're already in our private space with Alexi. Boycott everything from China. Some site has lists of companies using slave labor in their factories. It may be much worse than we thought. Things are changing faster than I can track.
We are in the phoney war, believe it or not.
There's a lot more kinetic engagement to come.
I'm watching the fortification of DC and thinking that they're trying to make it a really, really big "war." The official NYT history that our great grandchildren learn will say that it took tens of thousands of troops to defend the inauguration from DJT's army. Watch for the MSM to keep rounding the number up.
It's an entirely inflated threat to justify what's coming.
PS. Last summer, the riots targeted "systemic racism" and "white privilege" (in Democrat cities). But starting on January 20th, each individual conservative (ie. "white supremacist") will be in the crosshairs of government, big tech and BLM vigilantes. They're making lists!
"It's an entirely inflated threat to justify what's coming." And this is the thin edge of the wedge, K.: much more coming. All been done before. In South Africa, the inflated bogey-man was the threat of communism. Folk would be appalled at what the apartheid government got done behind that smokescreen.
Well, now the South African communist party is part of the governing coalition there. Bogey-men can easily become real when they are given the gift of credibility. I too don't doubt that repression is on its way in America, and believe that it will fuel everything which it hopes to repress. Already, there are enough loathesome people shouting their ignorant heads off in the American legislature to drive up support for anybody who will carry a banner against them.
I can't help, at my remove, but I know that my interests are at stake too and so I am a thoroughly partial observer. It will be interesting to see where the rest of the West stands on this.
So qualifications for a House impeachment manager are that they must be liars and transgressives. That makes sense because they need to be a microcosm of the entire government. It all becomes clear in it's full context.
Is it just me or is anyone else noticing that a small rag tag group of Republicans is showing a bit of testicular fortitude now that they know for sure they have lost completely? It's pathetically theatrical and predictable. They needed to get back to their rightful places as total and utter losers, and emasculated weakling suckers to feel good about themselves, and therefore confident enough to puke out a few butch phrases in front of the cameras.
What I have noticed is Congresswoman Cheney feeling her Never Trumper oats and daring her constituents to kick her out of office in 2 years. I have also noticed rookie Congresswoman Greene planning on trying to impeach Biden over his ties to the Ukrainians and Chinese. Tip of the hat to her for refusing to be distracted by the Congressional mob and focusing on what is important which is to keep our government from being a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese. Salute!
Not really. Who are you talking about?
That woman from Colorado, the sassy one with the Glock, has titanium balls.
Lauren Opal Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene are 2 House Republicans that will not be the silent obedient type of back bencher as they are already proving.
Anyone else getting texts from Republicans pledging to support conservative values and oh by the way send them some money? I have to thank Mark for seeing this in a different way and not sending them anything. I expect many more to come.
Now, THAT'S a Squad.
I have a different take on Pelosi's selection of the flatulent Swalwell: I think she is sending Chairman Xi a signal that it is not going to be just business as usual with China come next Wednesday afternoon, but China is going to get Most Exalted Nation status when it comes to DC. Better start learning Mandarin if you want to work in the federal government.
I once had an Asian fellow offer to teach me Mandarin. Much to my surprise, when I accepted, he pulled out a small musical instrument kind of like a ukulele and started teaching me a bluegrass song.
(Bad Steve, Bad!)
Just as long as he didn't pull out a grand piano and a 10 inch pianist.
Womandarin
Nancy Pelosi boasted of having lobbied the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to ignore or prevent any order from President Trump on the use of nuclear weapons during his remaining days in office. As she is not commander in chief of the armed forces, and as a nuclear deterrent is perhaps any country's best defense against a nuclear strike against itself, how is she not in shackles and an orange jumpsuit, headed to the Florence, CO supermax prison? She is suborning sedition, and actively imperiling the lives and liberty of the American people. Besides being just generally annoying.
How, indeed! Yes, that is the bajillion dollar question! She came down so hard on some who smashed a few windows and waved the flags of our nation's history around. Of course, it was a bad time to stir up the hive at the exact moment in time when the votes were being countered to ignore Trump's claims of extensive cheating in the election without being allowed a chance to present them before a court. The timing of everything was very suspicious.
Suborning sedition? How do we know she didn't discuss sending troops over to the White House to arrest Trump? Neither the silent coup nor the legal coups worked so why not try an old-fashioned coup? I wouldn't put it past her.
You're absolutely right, and think of all the outrageous things the Democrats and their supporters have done over the past four years, both in words and actions. Unprecedented bad behavior, even seditious, when you consider the stolen election.
But when conservatives attempt some sort of activism, suddenly we're sick criminals, violent, white supremacist wackos, traitors, etc. The Dems/Left have been pushing the envelope for four years and there has been very little push back by Republican lawmakers because they despise Trump more than they love their country. And now we are watching them do the Limbo, showing just how low they can go.
"... the votes were being countered..."
Very clever, Fran!
I probably set my glasses down and couldn't see where, but I did catch the typo after it was up and thought, okay, that works, too.
:)
"Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy," by the late John le Carré, begins with the rapidly ailing head of MI6, known only as Control, wrestling with a conundrum. A new source of seemingly high-grade intelligence has opened up, but its recipient in the MI6 hierarchy is somebody whose ambition is matched only by his ineptitude. Of all people, wonders Control, why pick Percy? He concludes that the intelligence is an elaborate fraud and is cover for a mole at the Circus.
So why Swalwell? Like Percy, he is ambitious (did he seriously think he would be President?) and also preternaturally stupid (did he seriously ditto?), but what did the Chinese see in him? Did they have some compelling reason to believe in advance that Swalwell would be elevated so soon to the House Intelligence Committee? Is Swalwell, on the other hand, the distraction, the intentional Chinese intelligence failure, whose unmasking drew the attention of the US "intelligence" "services" away from something much bigger?
You are assuming that the ChiCom's picked only Swallwell and not every Democrat politician everywhere. In Swallwell's case he is from the Bay Area of California and the ChiCom's have a natural 'in' with the large and politically powerful Chinese community and Silicon Valley. We know that Dianne Feinstein had a ChiCom spy driver for 20 years and Barbara Boxer is working as a paid lobbyist for a Commie front. A good intelligence officer would assume they have compromised all of them.
Fang Fang's only human, Owen. She can't be blamed for a Howdy Doody fixation. Love is love.
Inscrutable bunch, those Chinese.
Enjoyed your post and all of the responses which you elicited, O.
The United States is not much flattered by the calibre of its current leadership, I guess. That said, a glance at places such as the United Kingdom and New Zealand might suggest that excessive embarrassment isn't necessary, either. Democracy goes its muddling way. Been there, done that, getting quite good at it.
I gather that President-to-be Biden intends to preserve the most important aspect of President-soon-to-be-gone Trump's legacy: the fiscal blow-out is to continue apace, which means that the interest rate will remain derisory, which means that honest people with savings will continue to be the principal victims of governmental popular pandering. And of course, ever one up, he will go beyond it. Legislation is being framed which will make hypochondria compulsory and cheap power illegal. That will take us forward big-time.
In the Chinese calendar, with Saturn in the cusp of Ding-dong, this is the year of the occidental dolt. Okay, I'm not sure of every word I speak. Why should I be? Apart from recent precedent at the highest level, there are any number of exemplary and diverse agents of political wonderment and virtue to demonstrate that the legacy of fabrication is also sure to outlive its author. This goes beyond the pot calling the kettle black: the pot now impeaches the kettle for being not black enough.
Bracing myself for more shows of political wonderment and virtue than my constitution can stand in the next week or so. I may need to double my daily dosage of the MSC drug.
It seems the plan is now for the "trial" to take place after Jan 20th, so Trump will be dismissed from office some time after leaving to play golf. I suppose the Democrats are now following the script written by British Royalists, who dug up the corpse of Oliver Cromwell so they could execute him.
Yes, they can keep going and impeach other past presidents like Washington, Polk or Reagan (complete Nixon's impeachment) for counter-diversity activities they don't like. Start a BLM tribunal to investigate every past president for streamline impeachment.
They are planning one already.... like ZA.... a Truth and Reconciliation Tribunal. Outcome? Well, Winnie left some necklaces around just in case.
No need for a BLM tribunal, since the White House will be ruling by Executive Order. They'll hand Joe a thick, purple crayon and say, "Here are the new laws, Mr President. Just put a tick in in each box, please, Sir. Ermmm...Sir, that's actually a cross. We need a tick. Here, let me show you, Mr President."
With nothing better to do, the House can devote its entire time to impeachments.
Thanks for the laughs Mark! You have to laugh through it or else you'd cry.
I heard a clip of Pelosi on the radio earlier: the impeachment vote was "proof that no one in our country is above the law." Hmm. I wonder if that thought crossed her mind when she was in one of those salons she had on lockdown, sans mask! Doesn't she know the coronavirus has a 99.9% recovery rate, but for a woman in her age bracket, the CDC says recovery is only around 97%??
Well, as far as Nancy With the Frozen Face is concerned, one does not have to worry about being above the law if one is the law.
Man of Mystery strikes again!
But the nerve of this impeachment management team member bringing up Osama Bin Laden and 9/11.
Haha yes the international man of mystery intro was very funny.
In addition to Tucker's analysis as to why the Dems want to keep Trump around after he leaves to maintain unity, part of me wonders if Pelosi and Biden are pushing impeachment 2.0 and Big Tech is de-platforming conservatives in order to fuel even more violence by the extreme lunatics out there. Mark has noted more than once that less speech equals more violence. And, if some deranged individual uses a gun, Pelosi and the media will use that as the impetus to eradicate the protections of the Second Amendment rather trying to amend the Constitution.
God, how I pray that such violence does not occur.
"You can't win, Nancy. If you strike me down I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine." (Obi-Don)
"The Force us strong in this one."
Nice.
Wow, yesterday was stellar: guest hosting for Rush, on with Tucker, new Tales episode. It's very hard to keep up these days. As usual, you're right on the money, Mark. The new diversity is get all the enemy nations to the party. The Uni Party. It feels like the totalitarian curtain is now falling, or is it rising? They have already begun their work before Inauguration Day. They didn't require a real candidate to hardly leave his bunker, and now they have the CCP represented at the Impeachment II table to erase our last legitimate President from memory.
They won't erase the Trump following though, try in vain as they wish.
Mark, I simply must have a t-shirt with the Spy Who Shagged Me logo on it! Would you consider selling some?
Swalwell is back on the Homeland Security panel where he is well-placed to delve into Fang Fang, so the t-shirt is more relevant than ever: "My committee memberships [...] will give me a unique opportunity to delve into one of America's most serious national security threats" - ES, January 15th.