When Labor Day/Labour Day looms in these parts, we often have songs or films about labor - Metropolis springs to mind. But this year I thought we'd have a formicidal version of Fritz Lang's futuristic dystopia, because, in essence, in Metropolis men are reduced to ants - or antz. Antz came out exactly twenty years ago - 1997 - and, if you're curious about the spelling, Antz was presumably an attempt to appropriate for the insect world the street cred of rap. Even on casual acquaintance, one notices that the practitioners of gangsta rap display a strong penchant for our under-utilized 26th letter, as in, notably, the plural "muthaf**kerz". Spelling aside, just as I find it hard to distinguish one gangsta rapper from another, so too I find it hard to differentiate between ants: call me a bigot but they all look alike to me. Two decades ago Antz was only the second feature film — after Toy Story — to be wholly computer animated. It was visually thrilling, with dizzying lurches in perspective and spectacular depth in the endless gloomy tunnels of its subterranean colony, but its computers were unable to solve the problem of the ants themselves. There's one model for a soldier ant, one for a worker ant, and that's about it.
That, of course, is partly the point: an ant colony is a society in which individualism is deeply suppressed - which is a theme of the movie. But it presents a basic difficulty in telling the story, one which DreamWorks decided to solve by stellar voicing: there's a Woody Allen ant, a Sylvester Stallone ant, Sharon Stone and Jennifer Lopez ants, Gene Hackman and Dan Aykroyd ants, and so on and on. To be honest, aside from Woody and Sly, it doesn't much help matters, serving only to remind us how few signature voices there are these days: Jane Curtin is no Bette Davis, nor Danny Glover Edward G Robinson.
But Woody and Sly are enough. Antz was their first cinematic encounter since young Stallone played a bozo straphanger in Allen's Bananas back in 1971. A quarter-century later, Sly and Woody are insect buddies, one a musclebound soldier ant called Weaver, the other a schlemiel of a worker ant called Z. Sly gives an utterly charming performance and, as a bug, Woody is considerably less creepy than he is as a human. being. Obsessed for once with the vicissitudes of formication rather than fornication, Allen is not otherwise greatly changed from his live-action persona: Antz opens with Z on the couch of the ant-colony shrink, recalling the problems of being "the middle child in a family of five million". "My father was basically a drone and he flew away when I was just a larva," he whines. But his hour on the sofa is up, and now it's time to return to working on the colony's massive mega-tunnel project. "I'm supposed to do everything for the colony?" complains Z. "What about my needs?"
But Z's world is about to change. Princess Bala (Sharon Stone) is bored by her stiff of a fiancé, General Mandible (Gene Hackman), and decides to check out the action at the local bar. As the band strikes up "Guantanamera", Bala asks Z to dance and they take to the floor: in an interesting evolution of Sir Roger Scruton's famous thesis on the social implications of various dance styles, Bala and Z break free of the mechanical formation of their fellow ants and, like Fred and Ginger intruding on a Nuremberg rally, begin to express themselves as terpsichorean individuals.
Z is so smitten by Bala that the following morning, in order to get another glimpse of her, he persuades Weaver to swap with him and let him take his pal's place in the soldiers' big parade. Thus the marvels of computer animation - the only medium in which Woody Allen can get away with pretending to be Sylvester Stallone, and the then forty-year-old Sharon Stone can get away with being Woody's love interest (in his own films, she'd be playing his girlfriend's grandmother).
Eric Darnell and Tim Johnson direct with immense panache and Todd Alcott's script is drolly Woodyesque (Z on why he doesn't go for female worker ants: "They're career girls. They're obsessed with digging"). General Mandible mimics the heroic stance of General Patton; the disgruntled workers sing modified John Lennon: "All we are saying is/Give Z a chance." Only when it comes to the deeper implications of the picture's quaint idealism do the film-makers falter. Z finds himself accidentally conscripted into a war with the termites and afterwards, on a battlefield piled high with corpses, his dying friend Barbados tells him, "Don't make my mistake, kid. Don't follow orders your whole life. Think for yourself."
So Z determines to "get in touch with my inner maggot", sets out in search of the above-ground Insectopia, and, in so doing, precipitates a revolution among General Mandible's soldiers and workers — a very literal military-industrial complex. No longer are the ants prepared to accept their colonial classifications.
Even twenty years ago it wasn't quite as simple as that: The left hailed community and berated Mrs Thatcher for sneering that there's no such thing as society and President Reagan for unleashing a selfish world of self-interested individuals. A leftist parable about the dangers of collectivism was a bit unlikely even in 1997 when the left was already insisting on the classification of individual citizens as members of societal sub-groups — gay, black, female, differently abled. Two decades later, in a world organized by the algorithms of Google and Facebook, our colonies are as stratified as the ants' - transgender, Muslim, non-binary - with which designation come a supposedly rigid set of attitudes and behaviors.
Ah, well: Antz is only a cartoon. And, intentionally or not, it makes some good points, including a rather profound one: When Z and Princess Bala eventually reach their socialist utopia, it turns out to be a giant garbage dump.
~As our second season of The Mark Steyn Club cranks into top gear, we would like to thank all those first-year Founding Members who've decided to sign up for another twelve months - and look forward to welcoming many new members in the weeks ahead. Club membership isn't for everybody, but it helps keep all our content out there for everybody, in print, audio, video, on everything from civilizational collapse to our Saturday movie dates. And we're proud to say that this site now offers more free content than ever before.
What is The Mark Steyn Club? Well, it's a discussion group of lively people on the great questions of our time; it's also an audio Book of the Month Club, and a live music club, and a video poetry circle (we'll have a new poem for you on Sunday morning). We don't (yet) have a clubhouse, but we do have many other benefits, and an upcoming cruise from Montreal to Boston at the height of fall foliage season later this month. And, if you've got some kith or kin who might like the sound of all that and more, we also have a special Gift Membership that makes a great birthday present. More details here.
Comment on this item (members only)
Submission of reader comments is restricted to Mark Steyn Club members only. If you are not yet a member, please click here to join. If you are already a member, please log in here:
Member Login
6 Member Comments
Saw that movie innocently expecting a cartoon... clever, fun and it was absolutely awful viewing.
In one of those oddities of movie-making, it was another double year... what are the odds of two ant movies? Like the odds of two Scottish historic tragic hero movies... two Mars movies... always wonder which script was rejected then thought of to copy -- lamely.
Ants was so vile, such a turn-off that almost didn't watch A Bug's Life, which is a hilariously amazing mash-up of The Seven Samurai, (i.e. The Magnificent Seven), The Grasshopper and the Ants fable, Easy Rider and old time Vaudeville traveling shows. Never could tolerate anything Kevin Spacey, but he did make for an excellent thug grasshopper.
As a trained economist, Reagan knew that economics starts with the principle that people operate according to their own self-interest. The beating of the drum that Trump has been doing faithfully is bound to be having an effect, and when it reaches the average ant, the sentiment might be like that of Brexit voters. The EU and Nafta are very different, but they share a palpable giving-up of sovereignty and its attendant ills - not the least of which is a generalized, languid anxiety from not being able to control one's circumstances. Disneyland employees were recently demanding wage increases, using a bit more of an argument than is typical. If more dots are connected and the larger picture of their betrayal by the Democrats comes into focus, that should put issues similar to Brexit squarely in front of voters. If Trump can pump up the worker ants and continue to grow their numbers, they will be primed for action. Sometimes, trails of ants seen as the comings and goings of a colony will suddenly disappear. One reason for this can be an increase in colony size. The territory no longer supports its needs, so it moves on to new territory capable of supplying it. Democrats have abandoned the working class, so they may be living on borrowed time.
In many ways, this movie encapsulates what I find so incredibly vexing about Hollywood: their movies illustrate many themes that are amazingly libertarian and supportive of the individual, yet somehow Hollywood misunderstands their own movies and comes out in favor of the collective. Don't get me wrong, Hollywood only claims to be in favor of the collective; a more selfish, greedy group of individuals you will never find, other than perhaps in D.C.
You see this in people like Joss Whedon. I believe his movie Serenity (and the TV series that inspired it, Firefly) is perhaps the strongest statement for individuals and liberty in ALL of cinema. And yet Whedon himself is just another Hollywood wuss, a card carrying member of the collective, supportive only of abortion and women's and minority rights, as defined only by the Dems. All of Hollywood seems to embody "Blank for me, not for thee." What blank is matters not a lick - they are allowed to do whatever, the masses must just do what they say. They argue and fight endlessly for their own rights, while arguing and fighting tirelessly for curtailing and limiting the rights of everyone else.
And when you get down to it, that's about as simple and clear a definition of tyranny as anything.
I've never seen this movie. I don't think I have to now, because I'm sure Mark's review is vastly more entertaining than the movie ever was.
Happy Labor Day to all of my fellow Club members as we celebrate work by taking a day off.
Just reading Yuri Slezkine's "The House of Government" about the huge apartment building for the nomenklatura constructed during the first Five Year Plan. Reconstructs the works and days of the Bolshies that inhabited it. from the time they conscientiuolsy tried to train themselves to become Party-Ants, through the Revolution, assent to power,and descent (for many) to the Gulag and execution. Never saw Antz, don't mean to see Antz, but I like the image of their Antz Utopia. Made me think of the "House." Very apt.
Okay, who says that the motion picture industry isn't / hasn't been insanely duplicative? This movie has to drag up an insanely tired theme that has been repeated in virtually every children's movie and TV show for at least the last 50 years (and more than a few movies for adults...): Little guy with no chance wins the girl over the bigshot. Okay, OKAY! - We Get It Already! We got it in 1997 when this pap was first inflicted upon the public.
Even Mark has to dig pretty deep to discover some non-drivel in this movie. But it is so childish and stupid that you can doubtless expect a REMAKE of it in theaters soon with New! Improved! More Exciting! CGI... (And the accompanying Action Figures in stores just in time for the following Christmas.)