On March 6, 2020 at 4:00 pm, Dennis Morgan wrote:
Hello Mark. Can I have your comments about the current witch hunt of Bettina Arndt in Australia. She has a very long history as a men's rights advocate. She has been recently maligned by the PC mob for having an opinion concerning the Queensland Police handling of a family related murder by Rowan Baxter. The NSW Attorney General by name of Mark Speakman has inflamed the public humiliation of Bettina Arndt by recommending that she be stripped of the Order of Australia simply because her opinion didn't align with the opinion of her detractors. The usual PC BS to punish alternative points of view. Any thoughts.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:03 pm, Janet Long wrote:
Mark, instead of having the tax payers foot the bill for college and university tuition why don't we explore why that tuition is so high and increasing? Wouldn't it make more sense to find the root of the problem? What are these institutions doing with all of that endowment and grant money? Maybe the administrators and professors are being paid too much. Am I making this too simplistic?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Al Man from CA wrote:
I know the solution to the problem of America's institutes of higher learning churning out leftist, non-critically thinking, ignorant of actual history, pitiful dolts would probably be next to impossible to correct at this time in our existence as a nation, but if you became our Fearless Leader with absolute power over all (after the upcoming civil war), how would you fix the problem. Would we need lots of blindfolds?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:05 pm, Gareth Roberts wrote:
Will the EU help the Greeks stand up to Erdogan?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:08 pm, Jamie Marsh wrote:
What if the head of the RNC had told Donna Brazile to go to hell? Or if Ted Cruz had threatened justice Ginsburg? I'm just spitballing here, but wouldn't the media response have been a little different?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:08 pm, Evelyn G. wrote:
How can voters punish Republicans for not taking a harder stand against the thuggish Chuck Schumer, but still support President Trump?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:11 pm, Left Coaster wrote:
Historically, populations have been limited by way of war or pestilence. Neither has been lately as effective at it as abortion. Do you think the world is overdue for a divine come-uppance?
A fan in the wilderness,
On March 6, 2020 at 4:13 pm, Jill Felzan wrote:
How would you assess the state of Britain today? I mean mainly culturally.
In the mid-seventies, I spent a year and a half in London as a research student, living in an international student house. We talked about the British thing all the time. It was consensus that whatever you wanted to say about the Brits, they knew who they were. This at a time when the British economy was in shambles, the unions were ascendant, with IMF bigwigs calling the shots, and IRA bombs going off every night in time to make the 9:00 news. It wasn't a happy time but there was still seemed to be pride and conviction, as well as a deep sense of history and place.
A terrible decline has happened in 45 years, even with a Thatcher interlude and now Brexit. I follow Britain as much as I can, but can't seem to connect with the place. What really happened?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:14 pm, Natalie Olson wrote:
I think that everyone invested in the primary is forgetting about Tulsi. Just because she is from a small state does not make her less qualified to be president. She does the same job other senators do and I think is better at trying to be non partisan to solve issues. She is certainly head a shoulders above Bernie or Biden and i would consider voting for her should she win the primary. Do you think she could have a chance? I was also wondering what what your opinion was on the primary election process in America. How do you think it could be improved?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:15 pm, Michelle Dulak wrote:
Have you any clue why the Democrats abandoned Tulsi Gabbard so rapidly? I mean, here's a woman of color (and a Hindu to boot) who wasn't especially worse than many other contestants who dropped out ages ago. Sure, she kept on about her military service, and had an embarrassing predilection for Bashar al-Assad, but that's not significantly worse than the average for the 2020 lot, isn't it?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:16 pm, Paul Bohme wrote:
I read somewhere that UK bookmakers Coral are already offering odds of 60/1 on Meghan Markle becoming a Democrat Presidential nominee, not for the current US election, but for the next one.
Do you think there is some dastardly plot to install a woke Monarchy on the USA?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:17 pm, BigFreeze99 wrote:
I am a New-Bee here. I just wanted to thank you for all you do.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:20 pm, Clark wrote:
I couldn't help but notice over the past three years that our DOJ seems unwilling or unable to prosecute anyone of the Democrat persuasion even though dispatching perps from my side of the aisle barely raises a sweat. Does that worry you about your chances in the DC Court verses What's-his-name? I don't know how many peremptory challenges you'll be getting, but I suspect you'll need a boatload to find even one juror sympathetic to your (free speech or climate change) cause... not that your case will ever make it that far :-)
On March 6, 2020 at 4:23 pm, Laura Rosen Cohen wrote:
Hi Mark, you had a very interesting caller yesterday on Rush who expressed how puzzling it is that Crazy Uncle Bernie spews and boils over with rage about everything except being cheated yet again out of the nomination and, as you pointed out, how completely docile he was over Hilary's e-mails, signalling his electoral impotence (let's not discuss any other kind). Do you think that running, but not winning is Bernie's business model? If he runs and runs and runs, the money still comes in, but if he shows no killer instinct, he doesn't have to actually have to get a real job. Maybe he's never actually been in it to win it.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:23 pm, Drew W wrote:
Mark, in the election of 1944, the press worked to shield the failing physical health of President Roosevelt from the public only see him die just a few months after re-election. Seems history may repeat with the media poised to shield the public from Joe Biden's failing mental capabilities. Your thoughts?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:25 pm, Lief Billings wrote:
The corruption of the Biden family is quite remarkable, as is the lack of mainstream media interest in covering it. Would you agree that one of the most painful things to watch now is how Joe Biden's closest family, his wife and surviving children, are allowing him to continue along with this farce, to be ridiculed nationally and internationally and deteriorating cognitively and physically right in front of our eyes? What a terrible family.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:27 pm, Ben Poser wrote:
If Joe Biden becomes the nominee and we avoid an independent tovarishch Marshall Sanders run, do you think Joe could feasibly and physically survive the race given how catastrophically his mind is decaying? Could the Democrats be forced to yank him, commit his body to the ground, and throw in Michelle so she can finally feel proud of her country for the second time in her life?
â€” Ben Poser
On March 6, 2020 at 4:28 pm, Karen Marcus wrote:
The 'woke' feminists today have to decide whether they are truly feminists. Will they allow male to female transexuals ruin competitive individual sports for women? Will they support biological women who are in prison and fear having male to female transexuals (who have not undergone gender reassignment surgery) allowed in female prisons.
For the left, hypocrisy is a lifestyle choice.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:30 pm, Keith Hood wrote:
What about the Dems VP possibilities?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:31 pm, ed wrote:
Mark, I think the DNC was actually pretty smart in outplaying Bernie and well within their rights. When Joe gets the nomination, who do you believe he will pick for VP? Also, I find myself feeling more uneasy everyday with mocking him as he's looking like he might actually be diseased. Do you think he looks sort of frightened when he notices his own missteps?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:32 pm, Scott Schertzer wrote:
There were obviously major machinations perpetrated to get Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg to drop out of the race prior to Super Tuesday. What exactly do you expect happened behind the scenes for this to take place? Not only were they persuaded to suspend their campaigns, they also jumped in feet first to endorse Joe Biden. They must have been offered something very tasty.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:34 pm, Todd Lewis wrote:
Hi Mark. You said while guest hosting for Rush that Joe Biden's running mate would be the important choice because whoever it was would be running things in a short time. This, of course, presupposes that Joe is actually electable. So we have a guy who is, for all practical purposes, non compos mentis who could conceivably become president. Even if he was fully capable all that he is and believes would be deleterious to the nation and the world. Or how about our Canadian neighbors? Nobody in Canada knew the character and capabilities of Justin Trudeau? I'm always very concerned about the actual mentality of the electorate. Elections rarely seem to have entirely rational outcomes to me. What is your view of the mental acuity of the electorate of Western nations? Are we becoming too stupid to survive in the long run?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:36 pm, Catherine wrote:
Hello Mark, you have mentioned recently that if Joe Biden were to snag the nomination, the real question would be who is actually in charge. Who do you think is actually in charge here in Canada because our Prime Minister is clearly out to lunch, a liquid lunch at that.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:38 pm, Michael Trueblood wrote:
If we're going to get rid of the southern border, perhaps we should also get rid of all the other state borders. Then we could call ourselves the United State of America.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:40 pm, Stanley R wrote:
I just heard that Henri "Pocket Rocket" Richard has died. Can you summarize your hockey career for us? You are Canadian, right?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:43 pm, Andrew A wrote:
How will a presidential debate go between Trump and Biden? I can't imagine Biden repeating the scripted PC robotalk performance of Clinton in the 2016 presidential debates. Besides being a clueless empty vessel, how is Biden otherwise qualified to be the dream candidate to go against Trump? Don't actors still need to remember their lines? Will the moderators permit his wife or sister to stand beside him and translate, or maybe he'll get one of those machines like Stephen Hawkings had? I'm missing something.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:45 pm, Fran Lavery wrote:
Loved the three hours today, Mark, twice, when I know the parts when you get fired up! Yes, so smart and insightful about lackluster Bernie when it's his time, no fire; blah blah Bloomberg taking that shellacking, so unnecessary. Where's the fight?! Also, informative. I forgot all that about Trent Lott until you brought it up, and earnest calls came in, too. Jason from Oz from Southern Maryland was right on. The American people are doing their part, getting some good people in but once in office not all the elected people get it done. Schumer is an abomination for any elected official doing what he did. Frustrating to no end. Out with him, but no, he'll be there until he's 98.
Democratic elites run the election show. Why vote at all if you're going Democrat? They know who they need to select. It's a ticking time bomb this sham. How much can people take of these fake primaries? The country does deserve better than this. Rush is so heroic, and can't wait to see the upcoming newsletter and get the new Apple app! What a kick that will be! Thanks for all the hard effort and professionalism both of you men provide us!
On March 6, 2020 at 4:46 pm, Josh Passell wrote:
On Rush's show yesterday, you took a call from a listener who wanted to know just exactly who had cleared the deck of other Democrats to leave Joe Biden as the only alternative to Red Bernie. Within days, if not hours, Steyer, Bloomberg, Klobuchar, and Buttigieg had all been given the hook, followed shortly afterwards by Warren's retirement to her tepee. Forget talk of "the establishment", who had the juice to make so many more or less credible candidates drop like flies? Your answer was Barack Obama, and I'm certain you're right. For not only is he the only one in the party with the standing to make that happen, the tactic of taking out the opposition and running unopposed fits his M.O. He used it in invalidating the petition signatures of his chief rival for a seat in the Illinois State Senate; and he (or someone on his side) used it to get the divorce files opened for both his Democrat and Republican competitors in his 2004 run for the US Senate. President Obama has been notably reluctant to endorse any candidate so far, but are we to read the headlong rush of events the past few days as a tacit nod or wink in Biden's favor?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:48 pm, Thomas Gaydos wrote:
Great to hear you on Rush! With Joe in the lead with a bad leg and nobody wants to see Bernie win, would it not be great copy if the stalking horse named Gabner be the favorite as VP or the party choice. She is clean, no baggage, and a fresch face. You have thoughts?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:49 pm, Michael Trueblood wrote:
Bloomberg couldn't give every person in the country $1 million, but I bet he could buy a house in Connecticut for every homeless man, woman, and child in New York City (about 60,000 if they don't live together). One city's problem solved ... for a little while.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:50 pm, David P wrote:
I would be interested in your views on the Harvey Weinstein guilty verdict.
This article and the video it refers to seem highly credible to me.
It is not a fashionable thing to defend but there does seem a huge difference between being a sleazebag and being a rapist.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:51 pm, Raymond Swenson wrote:
The surest way to lose a case in court is to threaten the judge who is making the decision. Schumer would have been arrested and detained for criminal contempt of court if he had uttered his threat inside the court during oral arguments. If you had hired him to represent you in the case, you would fire him on the spot and sue him for legal malpractice when you lose. Schumer is the latest manifestation of the Democrats' disregard for the limits on the power of government officials placed by the Constitution. The Democrats are up to their old tricks from 150 years ago, who beat another member of Congress nearly to death on the floor of the House. Like the slave holding Democrats who rebelled against the first Republican president, they have decided that if they cannot get their way through constitutional means, they are ready to tear the nation down around them. They have failed at tearing down Trump through wiretapping, a corrupt independent counsel investigation, and an illegal impeachment that was obstruction of justice to block an investigation of Biden's corruption. So what is their next evil but stupid move after they lose to Trump again this November?
On March 6, 2020 at 4:56 pm, cecelia small wrote:
Could you discuss Ezra Levant's latest problems with Justin? Thanks. Celia.
On March 6, 2020 at 4:58 pm, Toby Pilling wrote:
Should we all join Toby Young's 'Free Speech Union'?