Mark Steyn

Steyn on the World

Where's the Lead in the Pencil?

The cover of this week's Charlie Hebdo (right) shows Mohammed shedding a tear and holding up a "Je suis Charlie" sign under the headline "Tout est pardonné" - all is forgiven. The illustration is unclear: Is Mohammed forgiving the secular leftie blasphemers? Or are the secular lefties forgiving Mohammed and his murderous believers? The Commentator devotes an editorial to the subject, and finds it "a strange cover" symbolic of "western confusion". On the other hand, Paul Berman in The Tablet thinks "uncertainty lends majesty". On the other other hand, over at Ace of Spades, they think Charlie's staff are mocking hashtag solidarity and "vomiting on all these people who suddenly say they are our friends".

When skilled persons who have never shied away from clarity produce a work whose meaning is unclear, then it is reasonable to assume the unclearness is itself the meaning. The surviving staff at Charlie Hebdo have undergone a week of surreal hellishness, in which their senior colleagues have been murdered for publishing images of Mohammed, and the world is professing its solidarity and egging them on to prove that nothing has changed. In other words, they're expected to produce new images of Mohammed, which may well get them murdered, too.

Meanwhile, no one else is even re-publishing the old Mohammed images, even as your basic Exhibit A in a news story - ie, this is why these guys were killed.

On the night of the attack, I was on Fox News with Megyn Kelly and said:

Yes, they were very brave. This was the only publication that was willing to publish the Muhammad — the Danish Muhammad cartoons in 2006 because they decided to stand by those Danish cartoonists. I'm proud to have written for the only Canadian magazine to publish those Muhammad cartoons. And it's because The New York Times didn't and because Le Monde in Paris didn't, and the London Times didn't and all the other great newspapers of the world didn't - only Charlie Hebdo and my magazine in Canada and a few others did. But they were forced to bear a burden that should have been more widely dispersed...

I amplified the point the following day on The Hugh Hewitt Show:

These guys are dead because back in 2005, these Danish cartoons were published in an obscure Jutland newspaper, and a bunch of fanatics went bananas and started killing people over them. So a couple of publications on the planet, including mine in Canada, and Charlie Hebdo in Paris, published these cartoons... Le Monde didn't, and the Times of London didn't, and the New York Times didn't, and nobody else did. And as a result, these fellows in Charlie Hebdo became the focus of murderous rage. If we'd all just published them on the front page and said "If you want to kill us, you go to hell, you can't just kill a couple of obscure Danes, you're going to have to kill us all", we wouldn't have this problem. But because nobody did that, these Parisian guys are dead.

Ten years on, the mainstream media had a chance to play this one differently - and, with 12 corpses at Charlie Hebdo, and another dead police officer the following day, and four Jews slaughtered at a kosher grocery store on the day after that, they had more than enough justification to assert their right to apply traditional journalistic values. But they chose not to, absurdly pixelating the images as if Mohammed has entered the witness protection program (to reprise the joke I did a decade ago), or cutting away when a Charlie Hebdo staffer attempted to hold up the magazine. Whether or not the pen is mightier than the sword, the White-Out brush isn't - and that's all the pen side is willing to pick up. As Andrew Stiles put it:

Journalists: These French journalists are so brave!

Readers: What did they do? Can I see?

Journalists: It's our policy not to show you.

So if you want to see for yourself a critical element of the biggest news story of the last week, you can't go to CNN or The New York Times or the CBC or The Daily Telegraph, you have to seek out obscure websites like SteynOnline.

So, for all the viral hashtags and Helen Mirren wearing a pencil brooch to the Golden Globes and George Clooney declaring "Je suis Charlie", what's left of the staff at Charlie Hebdo nevertheless got the message: You're still on your own. We'll send you a supportive Tweet, but that's it. Murderous-rage-wise, we'd rather you remained the focus. Hey, but we're all really looking forward to next week's controversial cover!

I prefer the fellows who just state upfront that Charlie Hebdo was asking for it to Dame Helen and untold millions all waving pencils, and none of 'em with any lead in 'em. Imagine being at the editorial meeting with the empty chairs, and understanding, even as millions around the world profess to be your new best friend, that you're still the lonesomest guy in town.

They did a Mohammed cover because they had to. But it certainly has an uncharacteristic passivity. And it feels like one for the road.

~On that first night, with Megyn Kelly, I said:

I see all these teary candlelit vigils and everyone suddenly claiming to be for freedom of speech. I think a consequence of this is a lot of people will retreat even further into self-censorship.

What would you call the last week? Never mind Mohammed, Oxford University Press has instructed its children's authors not to mention pigs, sausages or any other pork-related words - and then compounded its cravenness by lying about who it's caving in to, claiming that it wants to "avoid offending Jews and Muslims", as if any British Jew has ever complained about Piglet or a piggy bank. Still, the desire to "avoid offending Jews and Muslims" has a certain ring to it, doesn't it? Especially in that order. If it catches on, maybe they can drop the "...and Muslims" bit entirely:

CUSTOMER: I'll have a bacon butty, please.

PROPRIETOR: Sorry, mate, we don't do 'em no more. To avoid offending Jews.

CUSTOMER: Bloody Yids.

PROPRIETOR: Yeah, but what can you do?

At the Golden Globes, George Clooney said the Charlie Hebdo supporters had "marched in support of the idea that we will not walk in fear" - or was it "walked in support of the idea that we will not march in fear"? But what happens when millions of people are "walking in fear" and don't even know it? That's to say, they aren't aware that a giant apparatus of lies is being insidiously constructed all around them. Oxford University Press is lying in its attempt to blame the Jews for its literary porcophobia. But you can walk quite a long way before you discern that fear: Maybe years from now, you'll be sitting around and someone will wonder why they never did a sequel to Babe, or how come you never see Porky Pig anymore? Th-th-th-th-th-that's all, folks!

How about the Euro-elite's sudden commitment to free speech? How's that working out?

France ordered prosecutors around the country to crack down on hate speech...

So much for that. Most of the European heads of governments parading through Paris on Sunday in support of Charlie Hebdo - including Hollande, Merkel and Cameron - preside over thought-crime regimes ever more comfortable in policing the opinions of the citizenry.

I wrote a whole book on this subject, called Lights Out: Islam, Free Speech And The Twilight Of The West, and I'm happy to send you a personally autographed copy for the Oxford University Press editor or EU hate-speech commissar in your family. In the prologue, I put it this way:

Muslim lobby groups throughout the west are now using the pieties of political correctness to enforce a universal submission to Islam's self-evaluation. And their multiculti enablers seem happy to string along: Australian publishers decline novels on certain, ah, sensitive subjects; British editors insist forthcoming books are vacuumed of anything likely to attract the eye of wealthy Saudis who happen to have a flat in Mayfair. These are the books we will never read, the plays we will never see, the movies that will never be made...

The lamps are going out all over the world - one distributor, one publisher, one silenced novelist, one cartoonist in hiding, one sued radio host, one murdered film director at a time.

But it's more total than that. The Islamic enforcers will lead to a world where nothing is possible but dishonest art, which by definition cannot be art at all. And even the shallowest multiplex piffle will be lying to us:

A few years ago, director Roland Emmerich made 2012, a hit disaster movie in which human civilisation was suddenly destroyed by earthquakes and super volcanoes.

As is mandatory for such films, the destruction of world landmarks was depicted. Many of the enormous monuments erected in the name of religion featured in the destruction. This was, according to the director, a reflection of his opposition to "organised religion".

And so the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro was shown to roll down Mt Corcovado. The Sistine Chapel collapsed on to a group of red-hatted cardinals at prayer. St Peter's Basilica crumbled with the pope in its balcony and the falling masonry crushing thousands of the gathered faithful below.

Notably, however, no Islamic holy site was destroyed on screen. In an interview, Emmerich said that he wanted to show the destruction of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, but was talked out of it because of potential reprisals.

Pace George Clooney, no one will require you to "walk in fear", not yet. But you'll walk in non-fear to the movie theatre, and buy the Halal-compliant non-bacon butty and once in a while it'll occur to you that more and more areas in life don't seem even to be mentioned in public anymore. And then you'll sit back and enjoy latest the big-budget evasion.

~For a while, nothing much will change. American TV won't show the Charlie Hebdo cover out of sensitivity to its Muslim viewers, but it will show an act of analingus featuring NBC anchor Brian Williams' daughter. [CORRECTED FROM EARLIER MISAPPREHENSION] That's also insensitive to Muslim viewers, but no one has yet blown up the cast of "Girls", so enjoy it while you can:

According to cast member Alex Karpovsky, there's a sexual revolution evolving this year, and this episode may be a representation of what to expect in the future of television.

"Maybe that's one of the cliffs or peaks that we need to begin to incorporate into our societal representation of this revolution, specifically in television. This could be the year of the anus," he said.

Indeed. It may be harder to get Hollande and Merkel and certainly Mahmoud Abbas to parade through the streets for it, but I would say that 2015 is more likely to be the Year of the Anus than the year of free speech.

Spread the word: #JeSuisUnAnus!

~I happen to be in London today, enjoying the charms of BBC news coverage, but I'm looking forward to being back in my hometown later this month for my first appearance in Toronto in a couple of years. I'll be live in conversation with Heather Reisman at the Manulife Centre branch of Indigo at the corner of Bay and Bloor at 7pm on January 28th. Admission is free, but first come, first served. More details here.

from Steyn on the World, January 14, 2015


A Non-Essential New Year

A Happy New Year to all our readers around the world...

Continue Reading

Elections Matter?

"Elections matter," declared President Obama in his 2012 victory speech. "Elections matter," he reiterated shortly before the 2014 midterms.

But it turns out they don't. Not to him...

Continue Reading

A Death in Syria

President Obama dishonors an American's death

Continue Reading

The Will to Fell

The 25th anniversary of Eastern Europe's prison breakout

Continue Reading

The Strong Horse

From General Maude to ISIS: The rise and fall of the western Middle East

Continue Reading

Young Turks

In the Netherlands, a "moderate Muslim" is someone who thinks Isis is a Zionist front group

Continue Reading

Darkness Falls

One hundred years ago today - at dusk on August 3rd 1914 - Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, made a famous observation that endured across the decades...

Continue Reading

The Shot Heard Down the Years

One hundred years ago today - June 28th 1914 - Gavrilo Princip shot the Archduke Franz Ferdinand...

Continue Reading

Leaving From Behind

Back in the real world, Republicans don't lose wars and Democrats don't lose wars; America loses wars...

Continue Reading

Helicopters on the Roof

In May 2011, in the wake of Osama bin Laden's death, CNN's Fareed Zakaria wrote a column headlined "Al Qaeda Is Over"...

Continue Reading

Alone Again, Naturally

Mark's bestselling book is more timely than ever, from Japan to Britain...

Continue Reading

All Quiescent on the Western Front

In the London business paper City AM, John Hulsman writes: The greatest global political risk can't be found in Kiev, eastern Ukraine or any of the other hotspots that get the media so excited. It lies in the perception of Western weakness...

Continue Reading

East of Suez

The British withdrawal ...and America's

Continue Reading

Settled Science, Iced In

Steyn returns to the Speccie

Continue Reading

Funeral Spice

"I don't want to be emotional but this is one of the greatest moments of my life," declared Nelson Mandela upon meeting the Spice Girls in 1997. So I like to think he would have appreciated the livelier aspects of his funeral observances. The Prince of Wales, who was also present on that occasion in Johannesburg, agreed with Mandela on the significance of their summit with the girls: "It is the second-greatest moment in my life," he said. "The greatest was when I met them the first time." His Royal Highness and at least two Spice Girls attended this week's service in Soweto, and I'm sure it was at least the third-greatest moment...

Continue Reading

Surrender in Geneva

Worse than Munich

Continue Reading

American Ineffectualism

For generations, eminent New York Times wordsmiths have swooned over foreign strongmen, from Walter Duranty's Pulitzer-winning paeans to the Stalinist utopia to Thomas L. Friedman's more recent effusions to the "enlightened" Chinese Politburo. So it was inevitable that the cash-strapped Times would eventually figure it might as well eliminate the middle man and hire the enlightened strongman direct...

Continue Reading

The Princess and the Brotherhood

After midday prayers on Wednesday, just about the time the army were heading over to the presidential palace to evict Mohammed Morsi, the last king of Egypt was laying to rest his aunt...

Continue Reading

Obama's Melting Wings

In Enniskillen, Berlin and beyond, gassy platitudes only get you so far...

Continue Reading

The Less Unwon War

Ten years ago, along with three-quarters of the American people, I supported the invasion of Iraq. A decade on, I'll stand by that original judgment. ...

Continue Reading

An unstable truce with the Axis of Crazy

I greatly enjoy the new Hollywood genre in which dysfunctional American families fly to a foreign city and slaughter large numbers of the inhabitants as a kind of bonding experience...

Continue Reading

William & Kate have nothing on Obama

From the New York Daily News:

"Snooki Gives Kate Middleton Advice On Being A New Parent."

Great! Maybe Kate could return the favor and give Snooki and her fellow Americans some advice,,,

Continue Reading

U.S., Europe on different paths to same place

The Eurovision Song Contest doesn't get a lot of attention in the United States, but on the Continent it's long been seen as the perfect Euro-metaphor. Years before the euro came along, it was the prototype pan-European institution and predicated on the same assumptions. Eurovision took the national cultures that produced Mozart, Vivaldi and Debussy, and in return gave us "Boom-Bang-A-Bang" (winner, 1969), "Ding-Ding-A-Dong" (winner, 1975) and "Diggi-Loo-Diggi-Ley" (winner, 1984). The euro took the mark, the lira and the franc, and merged them to create the "Boom-Bang-A-Bang" of currencies...

Continue Reading

Facebook also a loser in Egypt

So how's that old Arab Spring going? You remember – the "Facebook Revolution"...

Continue Reading


From Arab Spring to American Autumn, Weiner twitpics to federal diapers, the Pundette has compiled an excellent round-up of Mark's view of 2011

Continue Reading


Our lesson for today comes from the Gospel according to Luke. No, no, not the manger, the shepherds, the wise men, any of that stuff, but the other birth: But the angel said unto him, Fear not, Zacharias: for thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elisabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John. That bit of the Christmas story doesn't get a lot of attention, but it's in there – Luke 1:13, part of what he'd have called the back story, if he'd been a Hollywood screenwriter rather ...

Continue Reading


"Useful stories" we forgot the usefulness of

Continue Reading


The President's wretched speech in Kansas

Continue Reading


What does America have to show for its investment in Egypt and Afghanistan?

Continue Reading


As the Jews learned long ago, and the Copts are realizing now, Egypt has spent 60 years getting worse, and is now getting worser.

Continue Reading


"It's the end of the world as we know it," sang the popular musical artistes REM many years ago. And it is. REM has announced that they're splitting up after almost a third of a century. But these days who isn't? The Eurozone, the world's first geriatric boy band, is on the verge of busting apart. Chimerica, Professor Niall Ferguson's amusing name for the Chinese-American economic partnership that started around the same time REM did, is going the way of Wham!, with Beijing figuring it's the George Michael of the relationship and that it's tired of wossname, the other fellow, getting equal billing but not pulling its weight.

Continue Reading


In this anniversary week, it's sobering to reflect that one of the more perverse consequences of 9/11 has been a remorseless assault on free speech throughout the west. I regret to say that, in my new book, I predect this trend will only accelerate in the years ahead. The essay below was written as last week's National Review cover story: To be honest, I didn't really think much about "freedom of speech" until I found myself the subject of three "hate speech" complaints in Canada in 2007. I ...

Continue Reading


HAPPY WARRIOR from National Review The other day, Abdul Qadir Fitrat, the governor of Afghanistan's central bank, fled the country. The only wonder is that there aren't more fleeing. Not Afghans; central bankers. I mean, you gotta figure that throughout the G-20 there are more than a few with the vague but growing feeling that the jig's up big time. Round about the time the Afghan central banker was heading for the hills, the Greek central banker ventured some rare criticisms of his government ...

Continue Reading

Follow Mark

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List



On Wednesday Mark starts the day at 7:30pm Eastern Time with Toronto's #1 morning man John Oakley on Talk Radio AM 640

~ At 9:10am Eastern Time, Mark joins The Morning Show on Global News to discuss his event at the Indigo Bay and Bloor store that evening. 

~At 9:00pm Eastern Time/ 6:00pm Pacific, he joins Byline with Brian Lilley on the Sun News Network.











© 2015 Mark Steyn Enterprises (US) Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted, without the prior written consent of Mark Steyn Enterprises.